Niche News

DHS S&T’s AmPPER Program Tests Measures to Reduce Risk from Increased Ammonia Handling at U.S. Ports

Interesting: 0/0 • Support: 0/0Log in to vote

Key takeaways

  • DHS Science and Technology Directorate’s Ammonia Port Preparedness and Emergency Response (AmPPER) program is evaluating risk-mitigation technologies for potential large-scale ammonia releases at U.S. ports.
  • AmPPER is led by S&T’s Chemical Security Analysis Center (CSAC) in partnership with the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center, Battelle, NIOSH’s National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, and Savannah River National Laboratory.
  • Testing has included exposure chamber simulations of water-curtain releases and evaluation of escape respirators to assess protection at high ammonia concentrations.
  • Preliminary findings identify optimal water-curtain parameters (most efficient droplet size and nozzle characteristics) and show colder water and lower salinity increase ammonia interaction and concentration reduction.
  • Ammonia production exceeds 220 million tons annually and growing use as a maritime fuel and hydrogen carrier increases storage and handling at ports, raising the risk of toxic inhalation incidents.
  • AmPPER results will be shared with DHS components (including U.S. Coast Guard, FEMA, and CISA), the American Association of Port Authorities, and the U.S. emergency response community to inform practical safety and resilience measures.

Follow Up Questions

What specifically is the AmPPER program and how long will its research run?Expand

AmPPER (Ammonia Port Preparedness and Emergency Response) is a DHS S&T research effort, led by the Chemical Security Analysis Center (CSAC), to develop and test risk‑mitigation technologies and practical protective procedures for large‑scale ammonia releases at U.S. ports. The DHS article (Jan 27, 2026) describes chamber experiments (e.g., water‑curtain simulations) and partnerships with federal labs; the article does not state a fixed project end date or overall duration.

What is the Chemical Security Analysis Center (CSAC) and what role does it play within S&T?Expand

The Chemical Security Analysis Center (CSAC) is DHS S&T’s center for chemical threat analysis and experimental testing (located at Aberdeen Proving Ground). CSAC provides science‑based threat and risk analysis, laboratory and field tests (including the Jack Rabbit series), 24/7 technical assistance to operational partners, and it is leading the AmPPER program.

What ammonia concentration levels are considered immediately dangerous to life or health, and how do the tested scenarios compare to those levels?Expand

NIOSH’s Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLH) value for ammonia is 300 parts per million (ppm). The DHS AmPPER article states experiments and respirator tests targeted the “high concentrations that will be seen in a release,” but it does not publish the exact experimental concentrations; therefore direct numerical comparison of tested scenarios to the 300 ppm IDLH is not publicly available in the article.

How does a water curtain mitigate ammonia releases, and what do 'droplet size' and 'nozzle characteristics' mean in practical terms for ports?Expand

A water curtain mitigates ammonia releases by spraying droplets that absorb or dissolve gaseous ammonia, reducing airborne concentration and changing plume behavior. ‘Droplet size’ means the diameter of water droplets produced (smaller droplets give greater surface area for gas uptake); ‘nozzle characteristics’ refer to nozzle type, flow rate and spray pattern that determine droplet size distribution and curtain density. DHS testing identified optimal droplet sizes and nozzle parameters and found colder, lower‑salinity water increases ammonia interaction and concentration reduction—practical implications are selecting pumps, nozzles, and water sources that produce the tested droplet sizes and sufficient curtain coverage for port layouts.

What types of escape respirators were tested and under what conditions were they found to be protective?Expand

The DHS article reports that air‑purifying escape respirators (escape hoods) were evaluated and found “protective at the high concentrations that will be seen in a release.” The article does not list specific models, filter classes, or exact test atmospheres; CSAC images name an ILC Dover Scape escape hood as an example used in testing but detailed test conditions are not provided in the public release.

Will AmPPER’s findings lead to changes in regulations, mandatory port procedures, or funding for infrastructure upgrades?Expand

The article states AmPPER will produce science‑based recommendations for DHS components, the U.S. emergency response community, and the American Association of Port Authorities, but it does not state that those findings will automatically change regulations or mandate procedures. Regulatory or funding changes would require separate agency rulemaking or appropriations; the public release gives stakeholders evidence to inform policy and operational decisions, but no binding regulatory action is announced in the article.

How and when will the AmPPER results and recommended procedures be made publicly available to port operators and nearby communities?Expand

DHS says AmPPER results will be shared with DHS components (U.S. Coast Guard, FEMA, CISA), the American Association of Port Authorities, and the U.S. emergency response community. The article does not give a public release schedule or exact timing for reports/procedures; CSAC’s webpage lists AmPPER project products (e.g., fact sheet, curtain‑mitigation survey) among its resources, indicating results and guidance will be published through CSAC/S&T channels, but specific publication dates are not provided.

Comments

Only logged-in users can comment.
Loading…