Important News

ICE Lodges Detainers for Criminal Illegal Aliens Arrested for Trafficking More Than 300 Pounds of Cocaine Hidden in a Semi-Truck in Indiana

Interesting: 0/0 • Support: 0/0Log in to vote

Key takeaways

  • ICE lodged arrest detainers on January 4, 2026 for Gurpreet Singh (25) and Jasveer Singh (30), both described as criminal illegal aliens from India.
  • Putnam County, Indiana law enforcement located 309 pounds of cocaine concealed in the sleeper berth of the semi-truck the two men were operating during a routine truck inspection.
  • Both individuals held Commercial Driver’s Licenses issued by the state of California.
  • DHS publicly criticized California Governor Gavin Newsom and sanctuary policies, saying a prior ICE detainer for Jasveer Singh in December 2025 was not honored and he was released.
  • Gurpreet Singh is reported to have entered the U.S. near Lukeville, Arizona on March 11, 2023; Jasveer Singh reportedly entered near Otay Mesa, California on March 21, 2017 and was arrested Dec. 5, 2025 in San Bernardino for receiving stolen property.
  • The statement cites that a lethal dose of cocaine can be as little as 1.2 grams and frames 309 pounds as sufficient to kill more than 113,000 Americans.

Follow Up Questions

What is an ICE arrest detainer and what authority does it give to local law enforcement?Expand

An ICE arrest detainer is a written request from federal immigration officers asking a jail or other law‑enforcement agency to: (1) tell ICE when they plan to release a person, and (2) hold that person for up to 48 hours after they would otherwise be released so ICE can come take custody.

The legal authority comes from federal immigration regulations (8 C.F.R. § 287.7) and ICE’s general power to detain people who are removable under immigration law. But the detainer itself is not a court order, and ICE now explicitly describes it as a request, not a command. Local agencies that choose to honor it may lawfully keep someone up to 48 extra hours (excluding weekends/holidays) so ICE can pick them up; beyond that, keeping the person jailed can violate the Fourth Amendment and expose the agency to lawsuits.

What are "sanctuary policies" and on what legal basis can a jurisdiction decline to honor an ICE detainer?Expand

“Sanctuary policies” are local or state rules that limit how much police, jails, or other local agencies help enforce federal civil immigration law. Common examples include:

  • Not holding someone in jail past their release time solely because ICE sent a detainer request;
  • Not asking about immigration status in routine policing;
  • Requiring a judicial warrant or serious criminal conviction before cooperating with ICE.

Jurisdictions can decline ICE detainers mainly because:

  • The Tenth Amendment anti‑commandeering doctrine says the federal government cannot force states or cities to carry out federal programs. Courts (e.g., Galarza v. Szalczyk, 3rd Cir. 2014) have held that treating detainers as mandatory would violate this principle.
  • Detainers are written as requests in ICE’s own regulation (8 C.F.R. § 287.7) and guidance; ICE’s FAQ now states they “are only requests” and impose no legal obligation on local agencies.
  • Holding someone longer without a judge’s warrant or independent probable cause can raise Fourth Amendment (unreasonable seizure) problems, another reason some jurisdictions adopt sanctuary rules or “TRUST Act”‑style laws limiting detainer compliance.
After ICE lodges a detainer, what typically happens next — will the individuals be held, transferred to ICE custody, or face federal charges?Expand

When ICE lodges a detainer, the typical sequence is:

  1. State/local case comes first. The person usually stays in local custody to face the state or local criminal charges (here, Indiana cocaine‑dealing charges). The detainer does not replace or end those charges.
  2. If the jail honors the detainer: when the person would normally be released (for example, after posting bail or finishing a sentence), the jail:
    • Notifies ICE of the planned release time; and
    • May hold the person up to 48 additional hours so ICE can pick them up.
  3. ICE custody and immigration process. If ICE takes custody, the person is held in immigration detention and may:
    • Be placed into removal (deportation) proceedings; or
    • Be removed under a prior order, if one already exists.
  4. Federal criminal charges are separate. ICE detainers by themselves do not create federal criminal charges. Federal prosecutors can choose to file narcotics or immigration charges in addition to state charges, but that requires a separate federal case.

In this Indiana incident, local media and DHS indicate the men are charged under Indiana law and that ICE has placed “deportation holds” (detainers); there is no public indication yet of separate federal indictments.

Were federal narcotics or immigration charges filed in this case, or are only local charges pending?Expand

Based on available public information, only state/local charges are currently known to be pending.

Indiana State Police and local coverage report that Gurpreet Singh and Jasveer Singh were charged in Putnam County with dealing in cocaine and possession of cocaine under Indiana law, and that ICE placed “deportation holds” on both men. Neither the DHS press release nor Indiana news reports mention any federal narcotics indictment or separate federal immigration charges. If federal charges are later filed, they had not been publicly reported as of the dates cited.

How does DHS define the term "criminal illegal alien" in this context?Expand

In this press release, DHS uses “criminal illegal alien” as a policy and messaging term, not a precisely defined statute.

From the context, DHS is referring to:

  • Non‑U.S. citizens who DHS says entered or remain in the U.S. unlawfully (making them “illegal aliens” under immigration law jargon); and
  • Who are accused of, or have been convicted of, crimes (here, narcotics trafficking, and—per DHS—one prior arrest for receiving stolen property).

ICE and DHS often use similar language in press materials for noncitizens who are both removable under immigration law and have criminal arrests or convictions, even though immigration law itself uses more specific terms like “removable alien” or “alien convicted of an aggravated felony.”

How was the claim that 1.2 grams is a lethal dose of cocaine, and that 309 pounds could kill more than 113,000 Americans, calculated or sourced?Expand

The numbers come from a simple but highly simplified calculation that assumes a fixed “minimal lethal dose” of cocaine per person:

  1. 1.2‑gram lethal dose: DHS and some drug‑education sources state that the minimal lethal dose of cocaine is about 1.2 grams for an average adult, though actual lethal amounts vary widely by person and circumstances. A prior DHS/Coast Guard release used this same figure: “With a lethal dose of cocaine being as little as 1.2 grams…”
  2. Converting 309 pounds to grams:
    • 1 pound ≈ 453.6 grams;
    • 309 pounds × 453.6 ≈ 140,000 grams of cocaine.
  3. Dividing by 1.2 grams per person:
    • 140,000 g ÷ 1.2 g ≈ 116,000 potential “lethal doses.”

The DHS Indiana release rounds this to “more than 113,000 Americans.” This framing assumes every gram is pure, used in a single dose, and affects different people identically—which is not how overdoses actually work, but it is how DHS arrives at the headline risk figure.

How were these individuals able to obtain Commercial Driver’s Licenses from California despite being described as in the U.S. illegally?Expand

Under current California law, someone who cannot prove lawful presence in the U.S. can get only a regular (non‑commercial) driver’s license under AB 60, not a Commercial Driver’s License (CDL).

Key points:

  • AB 60 allows undocumented residents to obtain a standard California driver’s license marked “Federal Limits Apply,” without proving lawful immigration status.
  • California and federal regulations still require proof of lawful presence and a valid Social Security number for a CDL, and AB 60 explicitly does not authorize issuing CDLs to people who lack lawful presence.

Therefore, if Gurpreet Singh and Jasveer Singh were in the U.S. unlawfully as DHS claims yet held California CDLs, that would mean either (a) they previously had some form of lawful status that allowed them to qualify at the time, or (b) there were errors or fraud in how the licenses were issued. Public records on this case do not yet clarify which of these is true.

Which local and federal agencies conducted the truck inspection and arrests in Putnam County, Indiana?Expand

According to Indiana authorities and local reporting, the traffic stop and inspection were conducted by the Indiana State Police Putnamville District, not a federal agency. An Indiana State Police trooper stopped the semi‑tractor trailer on Interstate 70 for a routine truck/compliance inspection and lane‑drifting issues. During the stop, an Indiana State Police K‑9 alerted to the vehicle, leading to a search that found the 309 pounds of cocaine in the sleeper berth. The men were then arrested and booked into the Putnam County Jail; ICE’s role came afterward via immigration detainers.

Comments

Only logged-in users can comment.
Loading…