Niche News

DHS says ICE operation in West Virginia arrested over 650 noncitizens, including alleged drug traffickers and violent offenders

Interesting: 0/0 • Support: 0/0Log in to vote

Key takeaways

  • DHS/ICE reports an operation in West Virginia from January 5–19, 2025 led to the arrest of more than 650 noncitizens.
  • The arrests were conducted under or cited in connection with the 287(g) program, which trains and authorizes local and state officers to assist ICE.
  • DHS identified the arrested population as including drug traffickers, violent offenders, and burglars and listed several named individuals with criminal convictions and "final orders of removal."
  • DHS said the 287(g) program can include financial reimbursement for participating state and local partners and called such partnerships a force multiplier for enforcement.
  • The release includes a statement from Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin urging more jurisdictions to sign 287(g) agreements and criticizing jurisdictions that limit cooperation with ICE.

Follow Up Questions

What is the 287(g) program and what authority does it grant to local law enforcement?Expand

Section 287(g) (INA §287(g)) authorizes DHS/ICE to enter memorandums of agreement (MOAs) with state, local and tribal law‑enforcement agencies to designate officers who—after ICE vetting and training—may perform specified federal immigration‑enforcement functions under ICE direction and supervision (e.g., jail screening and processing of removable noncitizens, initiating immigration arrests, serving administrative warrants). The delegated authority is limited to the functions written in the MOA and exercised under ICE oversight.

How does DHS's financial reimbursement for 287(g) partners work and who is eligible?Expand

DHS announced (effective Oct. 1, 2025) a reimbursement program for agencies with signed 287(g) MOAs: ICE will fully reimburse participating agencies for the annual salary and benefits of each eligible trained 287(g) officer (and cover up to 25% overtime), and will provide quarterly performance awards tied to ICE metrics. Eligibility requires a law‑enforcement agency to have a signed 287(g) MOA and nominated officers who meet ICE vetting and training requirements.

What does a "final order of removal" mean, and does it guarantee deportation?Expand

A “final order of removal” is an adjudication that becomes final when the Board of Immigration Appeals dismisses an appeal, the alien waives appeal, the appeal window expires, or a court affirms the order (8 C.F.R. §1241.1). A final order gives ICE legal authority to remove the person (ICE normally begins a 90‑day removal period), but it does not guarantee immediate deportation—removal can be delayed or prevented by stays, motions to reopen, lack of travel documents, foreign government refusals, or ICE priorities/resources.

Were the people listed and the larger group arrested convicted of the crimes reported, or were some arrested on allegations or for immigration violations only?Expand

The DHS release names several individuals and explicitly states convictions or final orders for those named; those specific descriptions indicate convictions or final removal orders. DHS’s headline figure ("over 650" arrested) and its summary claim that the group “included drug traffickers, violent offenders, and burglars” do not provide case‑by‑case documentation in the release. The release does not show how many of the 650 were arrested based solely on immigration violations versus on criminal convictions or active criminal charges, so the larger group’s conviction status cannot be fully confirmed from the release alone.

How many of the more than 650 arrests were for violent or drug-related crimes versus immigration-only violations?Expand

DHS’s February 9, 2026 release does not include a numerical breakdown of the over‑650 arrests by offense type. ICE routinely publishes 287(g) encounter reports that can show categories (e.g., criminal convictions vs. administrative/immigration encounters), but the DHS news release itself provides no verified count separating violent or drug‑related convictions from immigration‑only arrests for this operation.

Which West Virginia state and local agencies participated in this operation and under what legal agreements?Expand

The DHS release says the operation was conducted “in coordination with cooperative local and state authorities” under the 287(g) program but does not list the specific West Virginia agencies or the exact MOA model(s) used. ICE’s public 287(g) participating‑agencies list and MOA templates (on ICE.gov) identify local agencies that sign MOAs (Jail Enforcement, Task Force, Warrant Service Officer, Tribal Task Force models); to confirm which West Virginia agencies participated and which MOA(s) applied you must consult ICE’s 287(g) participating‑agencies list or the local sheriff/police departments’ public statements or MOAs.

Comments

Only logged-in users can comment.
Loading…