Important News

Labor Department proposes rule forcing PBMs to disclose fees to self‑insured health plans

Interesting: 0/0 • Support: 0/0Log in to vote

Key takeaways

  • The Employee Benefits Security Administration proposed a rule requiring pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) to disclose compensation to fiduciaries of self‑insured employer group health plans.
  • Required disclosures include rebates and payments from drug manufacturers, compensation when plan-paid prices exceed pharmacy reimbursement, and payments recouped from pharmacies.
  • The proposal is issued under ERISA’s statutory service provider prohibited transaction exemption and is intended to help plan fiduciaries assess reasonableness of PBM compensation.
  • Plan fiduciaries would be able to audit the accuracy of PBM disclosures, and the rule provides additional relief if a PBM fails to meet its obligations.
  • The rule targets PBMs serving employer-sponsored self-insured plans covering about 90 million Americans, according to the release.
  • Public comments are due 60 days from the proposal’s Jan. 30 publication in the Federal Register; the notice is available at the provided Federal Register link.

Follow Up Questions

What exactly is a pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) and what services do they provide?Expand

A PBM (pharmacy benefit manager) is a private company that administers and manages prescription drug benefits for health plans and payers. Core services include designing formularies, negotiating prices and rebates with drug manufacturers, contracting with and reimbursing pharmacies, processing pharmacy claims, managing pharmacy networks and mail‑order/specialty programs, and running utilization controls (prior authorizations, step therapy) and other cost‑management programs.

What is a self‑insured group health plan and how does it differ from fully insured plans?Expand

A self‑insured (self‑funded) group health plan is one where the employer (or plan sponsor) pays medical and prescription claims directly from its own funds rather than buying a fixed‑premium insurance policy. Fully insured plans transfer the financial risk to an insurance carrier that pays claims in exchange for a premium; self‑insured plans retain the risk (often buy stop‑loss insurance) and are generally governed by federal ERISA rules rather than state insurance laws.

Who are plan fiduciaries under ERISA and what legal duties do they have regarding plan expenses?Expand

Under ERISA, plan fiduciaries are the persons or entities who exercise discretionary authority or control over plan administration or assets (for example, named fiduciaries, plan administrators, trustees, and members of an administrative committee). Their key legal duties include acting solely in participants’ best interests, carrying out duties prudently, following plan documents, holding plan assets in trust, and ensuring plan expenses (including service provider fees) are reasonable—plus an obligation to monitor and document selection and oversight of service providers.

What is a "service provider prohibited transaction exemption" under ERISA and why is the rule issued under it?Expand

ERISA’s prohibited‑transaction rules bar certain dealings between plans and “parties in interest” (including service providers) unless an exemption applies. A service‑provider prohibited transaction exemption is a statutory/agency mechanism that allows plans to contract with service providers so long as the services are necessary and the compensation is reasonable and disclosed. The DOL issued the PBM disclosure proposal under that exemption so fiduciaries can obtain detailed information needed to determine whether PBM compensation is reasonable and permitted under ERISA.

How would fiduciary audits of PBM disclosures work in practice and what evidence would plans be able to request?Expand

Fiduciary audits would let plan fiduciaries verify PBM disclosures and supporting records. In practice fiduciaries could request transactional and reconciliations data (e.g., rebate amounts by drug and manufacturer, pharmacy reimbursement vs. plan‑paid prices, clawback/recoupment records), contract and fee schedules, claims‑level detail, and audit workpapers; the proposal gives fiduciaries audit rights to inspect PBM books and records and to obtain corrections or relief if disclosures are inaccurate.

Who enforces these disclosure requirements and what penalties or remedies exist if a PBM fails to comply?Expand

The Department of Labor (EBSA) enforces fiduciary and exemption rules; EBSA would oversee and enforce the PBM disclosure requirements (alongside other DOL enforcement tools). Remedies can include requiring corrective disclosures, conditions or relief under the exemption, civil enforcement actions to recover losses to plans, and other administrative or court remedies under ERISA; criminal penalties are rare but DOL civil enforcement and litigation are the typical remedies for fiduciary/prohibited‑transaction breaches.

How might mandatory PBM fee disclosures affect prescription drug prices or employer health plan costs for workers?Expand

Mandatory PBM fee disclosures could help fiduciaries detect hidden revenue flows (like undisclosed rebate retention or pharmacy recoupments), improve fiduciary oversight and bargaining, and so lower PBM‑related leaks of plan dollars—potentially reducing employer plan costs and out‑of‑pocket drug costs over time. The effect on retail drug list prices is uncertain: disclosures increase transparency and bargaining power, but price impacts depend on how employers use revealed information, PBM contract changes, and drug manufacturer pricing and rebate practices.

What is the Federal Register notice-and-comment process and how long could it take for the proposal to become a final rule?Expand

The Federal Register notice‑and‑comment process gives the public 60 days after publication to submit comments on the proposed rule; DOL must consider comments before issuing a final rule. Timelines vary—after the comment period the agency reviews submissions, may revise the proposal, and issues a final rule; that process typically takes several months to over a year depending on complexity and litigation risk.

Comments

Only logged-in users can comment.
Loading…