D.C. district court rules FEC delay violated law, grants plaintiffs' summary judgment

True

Evidence from credible sources supports the statement as accurate. Learn more in Methodology.

Interesting: 0/0 • Support: 0/0Log in to vote

litigation

The district court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order concluding the Commission’s delay violated the APA, granted Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment, and denied the Commission’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

Source summary
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the Federal Election Commission’s delay in responding to a 2019 petition for rulemaking violated the Administrative Procedure Act, granting summary judgment to plaintiffs (including Campaign Legal Center) and denying the FEC’s motion. The 2019 petition asked the FEC to begin rulemaking on contribution limits and the three types of separate, segregated accounts created by Congress in 2014. The court ordered the parties to file a proposed schedule by March 2, 2026 for the agency to provide a final response to the petition.
Latest fact check

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order in Campaign Legal Center, et al. v. FEC (No. 23-3163) finding the FEC’s delay in acting on the plaintiffs’ 2019 petition for rulemaking violated the Administrative Procedure Act and granting the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment while denying the Commission’s motion. The FEC’s official press release reporting the court’s ruling repeats this conclusion and the court’s docket entries include the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued on January 30, 2026. Verdict: True — primary sources (the court opinion as posted in the docket and the FEC’s official press release) confirm the claim.

Timeline

  1. Update · Jan 31, 2026, 03:55 AMTrue
    The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order in Campaign Legal Center, et al. v. FEC (No. 23-3163) finding the FEC’s delay in acting on the plaintiffs’ 2019 petition for rulemaking violated the Administrative Procedure Act and granting the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment while denying the Commission’s motion. The FEC’s official press release reporting the court’s ruling repeats this conclusion and the court’s docket entries include the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued on January 30, 2026. Verdict: True — primary sources (the court opinion as posted in the docket and the FEC’s official press release) confirm the claim.
  2. Original article · Jan 30, 2026

Comments

Only logged-in users can comment.
Loading…