THE FOLLOW UP
GOAL

DHS says it will remove noncitizens found by immigration judges to have no right to remain

Unclear

Evidence is incomplete or still developing; a future update may resolve it. Learn more in Methodology.

Interesting: 0/0 • Support: 0/0Log in to vote
enforcement

DHS removes noncitizens who are found by immigration judges to have no right to remain in the U.S.

Source summary
A federal judge in the Middle District of Louisiana ordered the release from ICE custody of four noncitizens on February 6, 2026, prompting a public statement from the Department of Homeland Security condemning the decision. DHS identified the four individuals by name, listed their criminal convictions and prior final orders of removal, and said it is working to remove them from the United States. The release comes after DHS announced a September 2025 partnership with Louisiana to expand detention capacity at the Louisiana State Penitentiary (Angola).
View original article →
26 days
Next scheduled update: Mar 12, 2026
26 days

Timeline

  1. Scheduled follow-up · Dec 31, 2026
  2. Scheduled follow-up · Aug 11, 2026
  3. Scheduled follow-up · Jun 01, 2026
  4. Scheduled follow-up · Apr 01, 2026
  5. Scheduled follow-up · Mar 12, 2026
  6. Completion due · Mar 12, 2026
  7. Update · Feb 13, 2026, 12:40 PMin_progress
    Claim restatement: DHS stated that if an immigration judge finds a noncitizen has no right to be in the United States, they will be removed. Evidence: DHS published a February 11, 2026 press release framing removal of such individuals as a policy stance and citing ongoing detention-to-release dynamics. Status: There is no public, verifiable indication that removals have occurred or a definite completion date; the policy appears asserted but not demonstrated as completed. Reliability note: DHS is a primary source for this claim, but the article's framing is partisan and uses inflammatory language; independent corroboration of actual removals is not evident in standard outlets.
  8. Update · Feb 13, 2026, 10:13 AMin_progress
    Claim restatement: DHS asserted that it will remove noncitizens who an immigration judge finds have no right to be in the United States. Evidence of progress: DHS published a February 11, 2026 press release describing removals of four individuals with final removal orders and noting ongoing efforts, including a 2025 expansion of detention capacity in Louisiana. These items illustrate targeted removals aligned with the policy but do not establish a nationwide, end-to-end completion date. Assessment of completion: A systematic, universal completion remains unverified; the policy appears to be implemented incrementally through individual cases and detention-center expansions, without a published timeline or full metrics. Milestones and dates: Key datapoints include final removal orders dating from 1995–2024 for cited individuals, a September 2025 Louisiana collaboration to expand detention space (Angola Prison), and the February 2026 DHS release tying removal actions to immigration court findings. These provide evidence of ongoing action but not a complete, date-driven closure. Source reliability and caveats: The main source is a DHS press release, which reflects the administration’s framing and priorities; independent verification of nationwide scope or cumulative removals is limited in public reporting.
  9. Update · Feb 13, 2026, 07:16 AMin_progress
    Claim restatement: DHS asserted that if an immigration judge finds a noncitizen has no right to be in the United States, the department will remove them from detention and return them to their home country or otherwise remove them from the U.S. (DHS press release, 2026-02-11). Evidence of progress: A DHS press release dated February 11, 2026 describes the department’s stance and reports actions tied to a February 6, 2026 court decision in Louisiana, where four violent offenders were released from ICE custody and DHS stated it would proceed with removals consistent with the final orders of removal. The page also notes a broader effort to expand detention capacity (e.g., the Angola Prison site) and to enforce removals of aliens deemed unlawfully present. These elements indicate policy emphasis and concrete actions aligned with the claim. (DHS press release, 2026-02-11) Current status: The claim’s completion condition—systematic removal of all noncitizens found by immigration judges to have no right to remain—has not been demonstrated as completed nationwide as of the current date. The DHS release describes intent and ongoing operations, but does not present a completed, end-to-end removal tally or a fixed completion date. Observers should monitor subsequent DHS updates for actual removal numbers and any changes in procedure. (DHS press release, 2026-02-11) Dates and milestones: The release notes the February 6, 2026 judge’s order in Louisiana and references a broader collaboration with Louisiana authorities to expand detention capacity (the Louisiana Lockup). The page is dated February 11, 2026, signaling the policy’s public presentation at that time. No fixed nationwide completion date is provided. (DHS press release, 2026-02-11) Reliability note: The primary source is an official DHS press release, which directly conveys the department’s policy stance and stated actions. Given the partisan framing of the DHS page, readers should corroborate with independent reporting and official court records for verification of specific removals and timelines. Neutral outlets and court documents can help assess whether the stated policy translates into measurable, ongoing removals. (DHS press release, 2026-02-11)
  10. Update · Feb 13, 2026, 05:03 AMin_progress
    Claim restatement: DHS stated it would remove noncitizens whom an immigration judge finds have no right to be in the United States. Evidence progress: The DHS February 11, 2026 press release frames the policy as a stated objective to remove those with final orders of removal, and the agency highlights ongoing enforcement actions and facility collaborations (DHS 2026-02-11). A February 2026 DHS notice also discusses enforcement tools and due-process context (DHS 2026-02-04). Progress status: The article documents a high-profile instance where four criminals were released from custody after an immigration judge’s order, reflecting court decisions and logistical constraints rather than a uniform, rapid removal. This suggests the policy is not yet complete but active in enforcement dialogues (DHS 2026-02-11). Milestones and dates: The DHS page cites a judge’s ruling on February 6, 2026 and a February 11, 2026 statement reinforcing removal authority, with a Louisiana detention expansion tied to the effort (DHS 2026-02-11). No universal completion date is provided; removals depend on final orders and operational capacity. Source reliability and incentives: The principal source is an official DHS release, which states the policy stance but frames events in a partisan manner. Independent reporting notes tensions between courts and DHS enforcement, indicating ongoing disputes over removal pace (external coverage referenced in February 2026 reporting). The evidence suggests a contested, evolving process rather than a concluded action. Conclusion: Current public information shows the DHS intends to remove those with no right to remain, but universal progress remains in_progress, constrained by judicial decisions and implementation logistics.
  11. Update · Feb 13, 2026, 03:20 AMfailed
    The claim asserts that DHS stated it would remove noncitizens who an immigration judge finds have no right to remain in the United States. Publicly verifiable reporting does not show a new DHS policy or directive matching this description; the claim appears to rely on a sensational DHS press post that contains inflammatory language and is not corroborated by credible outlets. There is no credible official record of a policy that would supersede existing removal procedures tied to final orders of removal issued by immigration judges. Independent and mainstream reporting in early February 2026 focused on ongoing tensions and procedural disputes in immigration enforcement (for example, reports about ICE detentions and court orders), but none established a new DHS commitment to automatically remove every noncitizen found to lack a right to remain. Fact-checking and watchdogs broadly note that removal processes are governed by statutory authority, judicial orders, and ongoing litigation, not a blanket DHS promise to expeditiously remove all such individuals regardless of individual circumstances. The DHS post circulating with the claim is not a verified policy announcement and appears to be disinformation or propaganda, lacking corroboration from trusted sources. Key credible developments around this topic include court orders and enforcement actions within the existing framework of removal proceedings, and the ongoing capacity issues facing detention and removal operations. There is no public, verifiable milestone indicating a completed or clearly staged implementation of a policy that would automatically remove noncitizens after a finding of no right to remain, nor a stated completion date for such a policy. Given the absence of corroborating reporting or a formal DHS policy release, the claim should be treated as unsubstantiated. Reliability note: the main DHS article linking to this claim contains sensationalized language and appears to function as a disputed or misleading post rather than an official, verifiable DHS policy announcement. Reputable coverage from outlets like Politico and other mainstream sources on related immigration enforcement topics does not confirm the asserted DHS pledge. In assessing incentives, the claim lacks corroboration from authoritative sources and thus cannot be considered a reliable representation of DHS policy.
  12. Update · Feb 13, 2026, 12:46 AMin_progress
    Claim restatement: DHS stated that if an immigration judge finds a noncitizen has no right to be in the United States, the department will remove them. The DHS release frames removal as a firm enforcement priority tied to judicial determinations of lack of entitlement to remain. The statement appears in a February 11, 2026 DHS news release and reflects the administration’s stance on removing individuals ordered removed by immigration judges. Evidence of progress or steps taken: The DHS release discusses expansion of detention capacity (e.g., the Louisiana Lockup at Angola Prison) and ongoing removal operations by ICE, indicating implementation activity aligned with the stated policy. Independent coverage notes ongoing enforcement tensions around compliance with court orders and removal execution. Evidence about completion status: There is no public record of a universal completion date or of removals covering all individuals found to have no right to remain. The policy is described as ongoing enforcement with case-by-case removals rather than a one-time completed action. Reliability and caveats: The primary source is an official DHS press release, which reflects policy messaging and enforcement intent. Supplementary reporting (e.g., Politico) provides context on how removals interact with court orders and agency compliance, helping assess real-world implementation. Bottom line: The claim is active policy language with ongoing enforcement actions but no confirmed universal completion. Status should be monitored for case-by-case removals and any new milestones or timelines as DHS and ICE execute orders.
  13. Update · Feb 12, 2026, 09:09 PMin_progress
    Claim restatement: DHS stated it would remove noncitizens whom an immigration judge finds have no right to be in the United States, framing it as an ongoing enforcement principle to remove those individuals. The claim centers on a commitment to removal for those lacking legal status per immigration judges. Evidence of progress: A February 6, 2026 court development in Louisiana resulted in four criminal illegal aliens being released from ICE custody by a federal judge, and DHS published a February 11, 2026 update reiterating its stance and ongoing removal efforts. The event cited was a detention release, not an immediate removal, and did not itself document a completed removal of those individuals. Current status of the promise: The agency asserts its intention to remove those with no right to remain, but public records show a release event rather than a removal in the specific case publicized. There is no independently verified record of the four individuals being removed after their release as of 2026-02-12. Dates and milestones: Key dates include February 6, 2026 (judge ordered release) and February 11–12, 2026 (DHS publicized the update). A final removal for the named individuals has not been publicly confirmed. Source reliability: The primary source is an official DHS press release, which provides the agency’s framing and stated policy stance. Independent verification (court filings, ICE departure records) would help assess whether actual removals occurred beyond detention releases.
  14. Update · Feb 12, 2026, 05:38 PMin_progress
    Restated claim: DHS asserted it will remove noncitizens whom immigration judges determine have no right to remain in the United States. Progress evidence: A DHS press release (Feb 11, 2026) frames enforcement as removing those found to have no right to stay and notes ongoing operational steps. Separate DHS and media reports describe enforcement actions and capacity expansions connected to removals, but do not document completed removals under the stated policy as of Feb 12, 2026. Completion status: No publicly verified case of a removal under this exact provision has been reported. A February 6, 2026 judge release case is described by DHS as a separate incident involving release from ICE custody, not a confirmed removal under the policy. Key dates and milestones: February 6, 2026 (alleged release of four inmates from custody), February 11, 2026 (DHS statement reaffirming removal intent). No final removal tally or confirmed completed cases cited in official DHS materials to date. Reliability note: The DHS press release is an official government source presenting policy intent; coverage from other outlets varies in framing and should be weighed for bias. Overall, evidence points to ongoing enforcement efforts rather than a completed, verifiable set of removals. Follow-up: 2026-06-01
  15. Update · Feb 12, 2026, 03:52 PMin_progress
    Claim restatement: DHS asserted it would remove noncitizens whom immigration judges find have no right to be in the United States, effectively tying removal to a judge’s finding. Progress evidence: There is reporting on ongoing enforcement activity and court dynamics related to removal and expedited removal, but no corroborated DHS policy or directive implementing a blanket removal pledge as described. Completion status: No formal DHS policy or regulatory update has been publicly documented to implement the stated pledge; thus there is no verifiable completion as of 2026-02-12. Dates and milestones: Public records show enforcement actions and legal developments around expedited removal, not a dated, official DHS policy adopting the quoted wording. Source reliability: The DHS page presenting the claim appears to use provocative language and lacks a standard policy announcement; credible coverage from outlets like Politico notes enforcement trends but does not confirm a new DHS commitment. Follow-up: A future DHS notice or regulatory update would be needed to verify any formal policy aligning with the claim; monitor DHS press releases and congressional records for a definitive policy statement.
  16. Update · Feb 12, 2026, 02:27 PMin_progress
    Restated claim and context: DHS stated that once an immigration judge determines that a noncitizen has no right to remain in the United States, the agency will proceed with removal. This framing appears in DHS communications and has been echoed in associated DHS press content that emphasizes enforcement and final removal orders. Evidence of progress: DHS has publicly framed enforcement steps around final orders of removal and the use of administrative tools to effectuate removals of those with no right to stay. In particular, DHS articles dated February 4 and February 11, 2026 discuss the legal basis for removal actions and reference ongoing implementation tied to final orders and enforcement pipelines. These pages describe the intended mechanism (removal after a final order) rather than a quantified, across-the-board milestone. Current status and milestones: There is no public, independently verified completion date or broad successful completion of the stated removal program. The available DHS materials describe processes and ongoing effort, and in one February 2026 post DHS highlighted specific cases and ongoing detention-to-removal workflows (e.g., cooperation with detention facilities and removal follow-through). No comprehensive, independent tally confirms a fixed end point or universal completion. Source reliability and note on incentives: The primary, explicit sources are DHS press/content, which reflect the agency’s framing and messaging. While DHS is authoritative on policy, independent verification from neutral outlets or court records would strengthen assessment of actual removals and outcomes. The incentives of DHS and allied offices to emphasize enforcement and legal conformity should be considered when weighing the completeness of the claim.
  17. Update · Feb 12, 2026, 12:22 PMin_progress
    Restated claim: DHS asserted it would remove noncitizens whom an immigration judge finds have no right to be in the United States. Evidence of progress: DHS has continued to articulate its removal authority in public statements and related communications in early February 2026, framing removal as the outcome of judicial determinations (DHS 2026-02-04; 2026-02-11). Court actions and coverage in the period show ongoing use of detention and removal authorities and enforcement posture (Politico 2026-02-10; DHS 2026-02-11). Status of completion: No published completion date or timetable confirms full removal of all individuals found with no right to remain. The available material indicates ongoing enforcement activities and litigation, with no single milestone marking completion (DHS 2026-02-04; 2026-02-11; Politico 2026-02-10). Source reliability and notes: Primary reliance on DHS official statements provides official policy positioning; contemporaneous media coverage aids understanding of implementation and litigation dynamics. Given the evolving nature of immigration enforcement, interpretations should account for court rulings and administrative guidance (DHS 2026-02-04; DHS 2026-02-11; Politico 2026-02-10).
  18. Update · Feb 12, 2026, 10:21 AMin_progress
    Summary of the claim: DHS stated that if an immigration judge finds a noncitizen has no right to be in the United States, that individual will be removed from the United States, with the official phrasing indicating a firm commitment to removal. Evidence of progress: DHS published the February 11, 2026 release reiterating the policy and describing a concrete incident in which four criminal noncitizens were released from ICE custody by a Louisiana judge, framing removal as the next step for those deemed removable. The reporting situates the policy within ongoing enforcement efforts and detention-space expansions (DHS News, 2026-02-11; Louisiana detention expansion reference). Current status: There is no public confirmation that those four individuals or others affected by the policy have been removed since the judge’s release. Separate DHS/ICE communications describe removal processes for those with final orders, but public records do not show a completed batch of removals aligned to the pledge (ICE FAQ, 2026-02-04; DHS News, 2026-02-11). Milestones and dates: The Louisiana release occurred February 6, 2026, with DHS posting the policy statement on February 11, 2026. The discussions around expedited/removal procedures and detention space are part of broader 2025–2026 enforcement activity; no explicit completion date is provided for the promised removals (DHS News, 2026-02-11; ICE FAQ, 2026-02-04). Source reliability and caveats: The principal source is a DHS press release that heavily frames enforcement rhetoric. Independent verification of actual removals tied to the stated pledge is limited in the public record; readers should consider potential incentives shaping official messaging when assessing progress (DHS News, 2026-02-11; Politico context).
  19. Original article · Feb 11, 2026
    View article
Back to Countdowns

Comments

Only logged-in users can comment.
Loading…