Evidence from credible sources supports the statement as accurate. Learn more in Methodology.
The amicus brief filed by the Department contains the argument that plaintiffs lack Article III standing for the stated reasons.
The U.S. Department of Labor’s official news release on its amicus brief in Konya v. Lockheed Martin states that the brief "explains the plaintiffs lack Article III standing to sue, because they have received all the benefits they are owed and there is no evidence whatsoever of impending default." This directly matches the claim that the Department argued plaintiffs lack Article III standing because they have received the benefits owed and there is no evidence of impending default. Independent coverage by PLANADVISER likewise reports that DOL argued plaintiffs lack Article III standing because they have received all benefits owed and do not allege any certainly impending default. Therefore, the statement is True because multiple credible sources, including the Department’s own release, confirm that the brief’s Article III argument rests on these precise grounds.