Kaiser to pay at least $28.3 million for members' out-of-network mental health and SUD costs

True

Evidence from credible sources supports the statement as accurate. Learn more in Methodology.

Interesting: 0/0 • Support: 0/0Log in to vote

funding

Kaiser pays at least $28,323,219 to cover members' out-of-network mental health and substance use disorder service costs as specified in the settlement.

Source summary
The U.S. Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration reached a settlement with Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc. after investigations found Kaiser’s inadequate provider networks and improper use of patient questionnaire responses limited access to in-network mental health and substance use disorder care. Kaiser will pay at least $28,323,219 to reimburse members’ out-of-network costs and a $2,832,321 federal penalty, and has agreed to policy reforms to reduce wait times, improve care review, and monitor network adequacy. Notices have been sent to potentially eligible California members who participated in the plan after Jan. 1, 2021, and a claims website and phone number are available.
Latest fact check

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) press release dated Feb. 10, 2026 states that under the settlement Kaiser will pay at least $28,323,219 for costs members incurred when seeking out-of-network mental health and substance use disorder services. The department’s official release and the settlement claims website confirm the payment amount and that it is intended to reimburse affected members; therefore the statement is accurate.

Timeline

  1. Update · Feb 11, 2026, 06:08 AMTrue
    The U.S. Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) press release dated Feb. 10, 2026 states that under the settlement Kaiser will pay at least $28,323,219 for costs members incurred when seeking out-of-network mental health and substance use disorder services. The department’s official release and the settlement claims website confirm the payment amount and that it is intended to reimburse affected members; therefore the statement is accurate.
  2. Original article · Feb 10, 2026

Comments

Only logged-in users can comment.
Loading…